Amirs of Caucasian Mujahideen
Tue., 25.02.1431 Hjr / 09.02.2010, 13:53 Djokhar time РусскийEnglishtürkçeУкраїнськийعربي

main

mirrors

add. formats
Google
Kavkaz-Center
WWW
Our button

News feeds
 
WorldEvents Also in this section

UN Expert Body Critical of U.S. Human Rights Record

Publication time: 30 July 2006, 11:23

Report Echoes Amnesty International Concerns

 

(New York) -- Responding to the U.N. Human Rights Committee conclusions regarding the United States' compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), Amnesty International said that the United States government must recognize that it is failing to meet a range of fundamental human rights obligations at home and abroad.

 

"How many times does the United States need to hear that it is promoting some of the most shameful practices in the world today?" asked Curt Goering, Senior Deputy Executive Director for Amnesty International USA. "How many times does the U.S. government need to be reminded how far its human rights practices have strayed from international norms? It now must adopt the Committee's sensible recommendations post-haste, and finally begin to restore its commitment to respect human rights."

 

The Committee expressed concern at a wide range of U.S. practices -- including, secret and incommunicado detentions, the use of interrogation methods that violate the prohibition on torture and on cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, the policies of "rendition", police brutality, the shackling of pregnant inmates during labor and delivery, and the use of electro-shock weapons such as TASERs.

 

The United States appeared before the Human Rights Committee on July 17 and 18 in Geneva. It was only the second time that the United States had reported to the Committee, and the first time since it launched the "war on terror" following the attacks of September 11, 2001 in the United States.

 

A fundamental issue of contention between the Human Rights Committee and the United States at the Geneva hearing is the U.S. government's view that the ICCPR does not apply extraterritorially -- that is, that the treaty does not apply to those held by the United States outside U.S. territory, which today includes thousands of detainees in Iraq, Afghanistan, Guantánamo and secret locations. The Committee, like other international bodies and experts, rejects this U.S. interpretation of its obligations under the treaty. It concluded that the United States applies an unacceptably "restrictive interpretation" of its obligations, including a refusal to accept the applicability of the ICCPR to its operations abroad.

 

"It is deplorable that the U.S. authorities refuse to apply fundamental human rights protections under the Covenant to those held outside the United States," Goering said. "More than four years into the 'war on terror', systemic human rights violations at the hands of United States forces clearly demonstrate the need for an end to this unacceptable face of U.S. exceptionalism."

 

Background Information

 

Amnesty International briefed the Human Rights Committee on a range of the organization's concerns under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights in relation to U.S. policies and practices inside and outside U.S. territory (see http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGAMR511112006). In addition, the organization attended the hearing in Geneva on July 17 and 18. Amnesty International also provided information to the Human Rights Committee at this session regarding implementation of the ICCPR by UNMIK (U.N. Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo).

 

In May 2006, the U.N. Committee Against Torture issued conclusions highly critical of the U.S.'s failure to comply with its obligations under the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, both at home and abroad. The U.S. administration was initially dismissive of the Committee Against Torture's criticisms. Amnesty International has called on the administration to ensure that its enduring response will be more constructive and one of fully implementing the Committee's recommendations (see http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGAMR510932006).

Related articles:

Iran says to unveil air defence equal to Russia system
Moscow 'recognizes' the Caucasus Emirate
Results of the election show that Ukraine is headed towards a political schism
NATO prepares to repel Russian aggression
Winter won't become a time for rest. Mujahideen hitting and attacking
Ringleader of city police gang, 3 apostates shot dead in Dagestan’s capital Shamilkala
Tensions rising in Ukraine ahead Sunday's presidential contest
U.S. intelligence is worried about the situation in the Caucasus
High-ranking ringleader of apostates eliminated in Dagestan
Contradictory information about battle in Chechnya's Urus-Martan district
U.S. National Intelligence warns of possible renewed war between Armenia and Azerbaijan
Turkish military surrendered and agreed to be out of politics?
Rabbi Weiner teaches, Judaism forbids Jews to harvest Jewish organs
Georgia TV fights satellite 'censorship' battle in Paris court
Apostate claim killing of Mujahideen near the Chechen village of Dacha-Borzoi
Two vehicles with apostates attacked on the Rostov-Baku highway in Ingushetia
Turkish 'Sledgehammer' against the Muslims
Russian invader terrorists murdered a rural accountant in the Botlikh district of Dagestan
SCANDAL. Turkish PM's wife not allowed into military hospital
ATTENTION! We do not recommend this material to readers with weak nerves
Karelians demand unification with Finland
Infidels send troops to the area of village of Balakhany and Zirani, Dagestan
Apostate Yevkurov counted Mujahideen, alleging that only 15 of them are left
RUSSIAN CENSORSHIP. Russian decision to jam Kavkaz Center was taken at the highest 'federal level'
Infidels claim Emir Seif al-Islam killed in the Botlikh district of Dagestan