KavkazCenter - Terminological warfare

Terminological warfare

New terms have been gradually established in political propaganda. They are being heard in the speeches of politicians, in the comments by journalists, political analysts and all sorts of experts in public relations. The new terminology is being aggressively imposed on the society in the status of some kind of incontestability and self-sufficiency. And today it is not that easy to just brush it aside and say that this is another trick that the builders of the «New World Order» are pulling.

The essence and the reasons of present-day global confrontation are being distorted by this new terminology. It’s not that hard to notice that new terms are supposed to have an effect not on the rational component of human mentality, but on the formation of emotional and imaginary stereotypes. This is why all these terms are being used 'with no ID', so to say, i.e. they do not even have any vague definition.

All in all, it is a natural tendency when a FALSE SYSTEM avoids any specifications of the terms, with which it is manipulating the minds of the masses.

The terms like 'unipolar' and 'multipolar' world occupy a special spot in the category of newly-introduced political terms. They are being offered to the society as a reference point for their worldview to evaluate the modern history and political realities. They also serve as a zombying matrix, which forms the options of the New World Order in the minds of the populace.

Main political comments and interpretations of the modern history are coming to the already known pattern.

There used to exist two polar environments, two aggressive camps with centers of gravity in Moscow and in Washington. And until recently the entire geopolitical picture was being naturally formed under the influence of confrontation between the two superpowers that represented outwardly irreconcilable ideological adversaries. The so-called third-world countries were the 'conducting environment' of one ideology or another and they had to stick to one of the camps. The war had an ideological bias, when the sides were using unflattering set of political definitions and characteristics against each other.

Sure, today the terminology of the victor is popular, and the political vocabulary of the defeated party is presented as ideological anachronism.

Saying that the Socialist camp suffered a defeat is like saying nothing at all. Even the word 'collapse' cannot define that unprecedented historical phenomenon, when the system, which used to unite almost half of this world, instantly collapsed. The scope and the unbelievable speed of this collapse are beyond any explanation, when measuring it within the framework of human fighting. It is impossible to perceive it as other than an evident SIGN FROM THE MOST HIGH.

Many Islamic scholars are predicting that America’s collapse, whose signs are becoming more and more evident day after day as well, will be just as sudden and just as impressive. But it doesn’t mean that the worldwide police force will disappear in a blink of an eye. It will just change its address, its mask and its mottos.

Enough of this excursus. And so, one of the polar pyramids, -- the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, the Soviet Union and the Socialist camp, -- has collapsed. And the world has become 'unipolar', since only one superpower has remained, -- the US, and accordingly, one 'pole', -- Washington. Once it started feeling as the only superpower and once it awarded itself with the epithet of 'the only pole', the US has started implementing the concept of a 'unipolar world', based not even on the so-called International Law, but on outright 'gangster’s' concepts. It caused an outburst of resentment and serious indignation among those who recently were allies. The latter are active supporters of what they view as more acceptable of a concept of 'multipolar world'. And at least Strasbourg, Moscow and Beijing are the ones who want to be rated among the 'poles' today.

Frequent repeating of the words 'unipolar' and 'multipolar' somewhat dulls the critical mindset and distracts from the semantic discrepancy that they imply. It must be assumed that before bombing the brains of the ordinary citizens with these mutant terms, these terms were approved by countless advisers of the number one persons in the world politics. Doesn’t it mean that the entire army of Zionist sages, which found a dwelling place for themselves at the centers of the world politics, has no idea about logical and semantic analysis? No, it does not. No thorough substantiation of any concepts is required to manipulate the minds of the populace, all you have to do is keep repeating them.

In the middle of the total triumph of lies, the problem that we touched on does not seem to be too much of an error at first glance. Here you feel like delving into detailed classification of lies, but this is a whole different subject. Let’s just try to stress that these lies are different from that abundant flow that we hear in our everyday life. And let’s try to stress what kind of critical evaluation it gets in the minds of the masses.

For instance, when Israel tells everybody that 2 Jews died and 122 were injured in a 'terrorist attack', this report can be taken at its face value one, two or three times. But when we are constantly given the proportions of killed and injured as 1 to 60 or 1 to 50, one may certainly cast doubt on it. Because elementary experience shows that in such situations the proportion of killed and injured varies from 1:3 to 1:10.

But here the lies with understating the number of casualties has not too complicated of a motivation. It is dictated by the wish «not to induce panic and so that the enemies do not feel happy about it». This is the similar comforting arithmetic that the US has been using when reporting about its casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan. But all kinds of even the most unbelievable things can happen during a war. It is possible when 128 die and only 8 survive. Or 18 may get wounded and there are no dead at all. Therefore in these cases you can argue about a certain degree of probability, but you can never deny the possibility.

Number-wise lulling is the most popular way of lying, because it does not require much intellectual investment and as the politicians believe, it allows «maintaining the situation under control» for some period of time. Sometimes it is the only way to preserve hope within the society that «not everything has been lost yet, and it’s not as scary as it seems to be».

The example is the understated figure of victims quoted by the American propaganda after the September 11 attack in New York City. Or another example is when Putin was announcing the results of All-Russian census. He made so much emphasis when he repeated the number of '145 million', that you could even tell he was exaggerating! But can you imagine how lost and how vulnerable would the Russian public, dreaming of the revival of bygone might, feel if the number was 12-13 million less, which actually agrees to the average annual death rate among Russians. Even sparing subtraction within 6-7 million would not have saved Russians from dismay and despondency. Therefore it is no wonder that such information is tabooed.

The whole life is permeated with lies in the society of unbelievers. These people cannot imagine their existence without lies. Spouses are lying to each other, children are lying to their parents, an official is trying to lie to his auditor, people’s elect is lying to the voters, and witnesses are lying in court. And this issue is not dictated by the dilemma of «to lie or not to lie»; the issue is in how to make the lies sound more believable, more inventive and finally how to lie in a more acceptable form.

Huge industries have been created, which specialize in duping the masses, thanks to whom this whole system is being maintained, -- built on lies and hypocrisy. A thought is being hammered into people’s heads that there is no and there can be no other way.

Speeches of all sorts of 'experts' have been made lately, which are committing violence against common sense and human morals when dogmatically claiming that there is no life without myths and that the society without any myths will collapse.

We must agree with it: the SOCIETY OF LIES, where myths serve as the 'supporting construction', really will collapse. It is no wonder that in such a society the most skilful liar is always the most popular leader.

The options described above are spread in everyday life and in politics and are clear to any person: from a housewife to an academician. From time to time the 'plainness' of these lies provokes excitement of exposure in the minds of ordinary citizens. Pretty often the political groups that are out of business are seizing the moment to heat up the society’s outrage and earn some political points by doing it.

There is also another kind of lies, which form a worldview complex in a certain direction, and the critics are protecting it like a religious dogma. Its apologists are filling the people’s minds with mythical constructions, which are allegedly confirmed scientifically. And it is done by unscrupulous distortion or silencing of scientific facts.For instance, one of such popular scientific programs is never even doubted: Darwinism and the evolution theory. And it’s in spite of the fact that modern achievements in genetics, biology and paleontology proved the evolutionists wrong long time ago and proved absolute groundlessness of their theory. But nonsense is still being persistently and systematically fed to ordinary people about how millions of years ago wings started growing on frogs and frogs started flying from one place to another in search for a good swamp.

Or they are telling how fins of a crossopterygian fish turned into feet, how their scales turned into fur and how easy that fish started climbing trees and eating mangos, by the wave of the magic wand of the Darwinists.

TV screens got flooded with all kinds of titled babblers, who almost claim to be eyewitnesses when telling what our ancestors used to do in the beginning of Neolithic age, but who are trying to convince everybody that it is impossible to restore the real picture of any historical event that happened even ten years ago.

It is striking that during the golden age of informational technologies today the great number of discoveries and facts accumulated by the modern science, incompatible with that legalized absurd, still remains within narrow scientific circles and some unbelievable tricks are used to block them on the approaches to the MASS MEDIA. Not to mention the fact that there is not a single school textbook where you could find a scientific interpretation of new discoveries in genetics and biology, testifying for the truth.

Here we encounter the main phenomenon of heathen mentality, when the belief is being built on absolutely incompatible concepts: on faith in God as the Creator, and at the same time on the assurance that a man came from an ape and that a «spiral forward movement» is a 'natural' historical model. Now add the Chinese calendar, the idiotic horoscope and other stuff, which is just as stupid, and don’t worry: there will be no reaction from the sleeping intellect.

People like to be classifying their own selves. The entire human history is flashing with the names, nicknames and labels. There are all sorts of features by which a man classifies his genus: skin color, language, habitat, religious beliefs, bank account numbers, gender, age, political bias, names of leaders, names of idols, occupation, temperament, rhythms of sleep and wake.

God, Who created the human race, is classifying it as well. And He brought the classification of humans through the Torah, the Gospel and the Koran. And there are two types of humans in this classification: people who adhere to monotheism and people who ascribe companions to Allah, or polytheists (heathens).

The Koran calls all of those, who do not adhere to monotheism, as Kafirs. The word 'kafir' means «one who conceals and hides» (THE TRUTH). This is the most fundamental and integral part of them. Concealing the truth defines their essence. A Kafir uses all kinds of perverted methods to conceal the truth. He distorts the reality not only by blatant lies, but he also substitutes it with half-truth, he silences the truth, substitutes and perverts it. And he does not just substitute the truth by lies, but he feels discomfort unless some filth is added to these lies. This is his nature. And in vain do the Muslims get outraged with abundance of lies in Russian or Western propaganda. We don’t get outraged when a snake emits venom or when a pig looks for dirt: such is their nature.

But back to the 'polarity', whose perverted concept the modern priests have been pushing into the minds of the masses. The very definition of 'polarity' implies the presence of TWO centers of activity, which are opposite to each other (opposite charges). And one can talk about 'polarity' only within the framework of certain functional environment or system. There can be no three, ten or thirty, and so on… poles in one system. Nor can there be 'unipolarity' in nature, at least in this life. These ideas are fiction aimed at the formation of distorted beliefs.

The concepts 'multipolar' and 'unipolar' do not sound right, because there are UNNATURAL first of all. Heathen fantasies have always been inclined towards unnatural images. Let’s recall all sorts of centaurs, sphinxes, or people with dog’s heads. These ugly images, which are against the common sense and laws of nature, are still causing esthetic delight among representatives of the Western culture.

Without delving into the debris of heathen upbringing, we are stating that there can be ONLY TWO poles. For example, 'North' and 'South', 'Anode' and 'Cathode', 'Man' and 'Woman', 'Right' and 'Left', 'Yes' and 'No', 'Life' and 'Death', and so on, and so forth… That is, by calling some phenomenon or subject 'polar', we imply that this phenomenon is «ONE OF THE TWO», which combines the common nature and opposite orientation and makes sense within a specific system.

But maybe those who launched these defected phrases meant the world’s 'diversity' and got these concepts accidentally confused? Not really, they did not. This distortion is necessary to maintain the whole layer of mythical structures and false values, which are forming the global false religion.

Of course, the idea of 'polarity' is applicable to the description of history, but only in the rank of philosophical category and universal law of existence. The history has enough of examples, when two rivaling centers with about equal power would emerge from nations and tribes, states and cities that were hostile to each other. All other tribes or states were just watching their fight, and in order to survive they had to stick to one camp or another. The examples are: Assyria and Egypt, Rome and Carthage, Byzantium and Persia, Napoleon’s France and England, and finally, the confrontation between the Soviet Union with its Socialist camp and the US and Western Europe was being presented as an example of historical polarity.

This is what it looks like from the outside. How serious the political tension was felt during the Cold War! How much tensions and dramatic effects were involved in this implacable ideological battle, which was splitting the globe! But there are some doubts arising, since a pole is a constant! A pole does not tumble down like a house of cards and does not disappear in an instant. And therefore you can claim with full confidence that the Soviet Union was not and could not be an opposite pole.We were witnessing only confrontation of two centers, two bulging parts in a unipolar environment (with the same name). Disagreements of the two ideologies were happening on the verge of a nuclear war. And this is why it is unbelievable to see that easiness, with which former Soviet republics bowed down to America and to Western Europe. How fast did they cast their ideologies aside and how easy did they agree to the new interpretation of history! Even though several generations were suffering privations and were ready to die, and tens of millions of lives were taken away under the Red Banner!

The ideology, which is so easy to destroy and which is being recalled as a historical joke several years later, can never be viewed as a pole under any circumstances. This fact proves that Socialism was an imitation pole. Let’s say, it was a successful imitation pole, almost plausible one.

We would have still been deluded had the sudden collapse not exposed the phony nature of that 'polarity'.

Here we can see another satanic distortion. Official historiography in all of the so-called developed countries is thoroughly avoiding the issue of religious polarity, which has always been and will always be the main motive force in the world’s history. The wars that the prophets and righteous kings of the past were waging are being presented as fairytales and legends a lot less reliable than myths of ancient Greece. Western European historiography has been bogged down in rapturous descriptions of heathen empires and wars between them for quite a while. But actually, the real confrontation of that time was the confrontation between ancient monotheistic Judea and pagan Rome.

Religious confrontation has been the main thing in the endless series of wars, revolutions, conflicts and tensions, which have been accompanying the human history all the way through. This confrontation never disappears or changes with times or generations. Not even a formal pretext is often needed for this particular confrontation to develop into a military aggression.

There was a time when Napoleon’s France and England seized each other in a death grip and were fighting for life or death. But at the same time neither Bonaparte nor Admiral Nelson believed that they needed some excuses to justify military aggression against Egypt, Syria or any other Muslim territories. And whatever arguments and disagreement the European states might have been shaken with later on, colonial marches to the Muslim countries were a normal occurrence for them, like something plain and beyond discussion.

Since we brought up Napoleon, we must also mention some significant moments of those times. While describing Napoleon’s successes as steps of the genius, his biographers could not quite explain what the logic or strategic necessity for his march to Egypt was. And it was at the time when the situation in Europe was far from being peaceful and when the alignment of forces was not uniform. Moreover, during the Mediterranean cruises the French Army could have become an easy prey for Admiral Nelson.

The version that this is how English connections with India could be blocked does not sound too convincing. Most often the explanation for this scam is that Napoleon suffered a virus of greatness after great successes in several war campaigns, and he was obsessed with the laurels of Alexander the Great or Julius Caesar.

And the second case is when during the Syrian march four thousand soldiers of Ottoman Sultan surrendered their fortress to the French and believed the promise that their lives would be spared. They believed what Napoleon and his generals said. Even some code of honor is usually observed in any war. There are some obligations before prisoners of war or before wounded adversaries involved. Napoleon ordered to shoot all captive Ottoman soldiers, every single one of them.

They say that Napoleon’s guardsmen could not be recalling that mass murder without shuddering. They say Napoleon was suffering and could not sleep all night when making that decision. We are not going to debate about it. We will just stress that he would have never made such a decision against Austrians, the British or Prussians. Such evildoing is hard to explain with the lack of food or drinking water, like his biographers are trying to suggest. He probably did not fully realize it, but we are sure that he was guided by that inborn hatred deep inside, which he felt towards Islam and Muslims in his heart, while viewing himself as being incompatible with this religion and its representatives.

Modern times have not changed anything. America, Western Europe, Russia, and everybody else who has excessive weaponry are cynically and hypocritically using 'human rights' when justifying their aggressions. And as we can see, these so-called 'rights' can be attached to anybody but Muslims.

Kipling was the one who once mentioned the polar incompatibility of the two worldviews. He was the one who said that the East and the West would never meet. In order to ward off the typical 'refuting' examples in this particular case, we would like to say that Kipling did not mean Yoga, Zen-Buddhism, Upanishads, Daoism or the like (which men of the West plunge into with infantile trembling, hoping to partake of the MYSTERY), when speaking about the 'East', which will never meet with the West. He meant the MUSLIM EAST.

«Oh, East is East, and West is West, and never the twain shall meet, Till Earth and Sky stand presently at God's great Judgment Seat».

The terms 'culture' and 'civilization' are used when stressing on difference, discrepancies, peculiarities and incompatibility of world outlooks. But really, they resort to these terms in order not to name the defining key word -- RELIGION. This fact can be viewed as a tribute to secret silencing of anything that has to do with religion, which modern adepts of atheism are resorting to.

A certain conclusion is arising during our discussion: applied to mankind, the pole is first of all the RELIGION or ideology elevated to the ranks of religion (like Socialism or Democracy). We have already made it clear that there cannot be many poles, there are only two of them, and polarity in nature is something constant and attributive that never disappears. Then, since polarity in human existence is determined by the religion, another lie is being exposed: about existence of many religions.

There are only two religions, two polar mutually incompatible ideologies, two worldviews, which never blend with each other: monotheism and polytheism (heathenism). There is only one way of the truth, and there are many false heathen deadlocks. And each time the lies are trying to carry away the inexperienced souls with diversity and novelty.

There was a time when Montagne caught this peculiarity. This is what he writes in his 'Experiences':

«If a lie had no more faces but one, as truth had, we should be in far better terms than we are: For whatsoever a liar should say, we would take it in a contrary sense. But the opposite of truth has many shapes, and an indefinite field».

Democracy will crumble, just like Socialism did. The very fact that the Western alliance is constantly practicing the policy of double standards says that the so-called democracy is nothing but a temporal mythological screen, but not the truth to undeviatingly adhere to.

The so-called winning pole, which in our case is the US, in this particular sense must be viewed with certain reservations. American philosophy or Western European democracy are only a temporary center of the polar environment, «one of hundreds of thousands of forms». Heathenism (lies) is the constant component, which forms and preserves the polarity of this particular environment.

This religion absorbs any idea based on the principle that is 'AGAINST' the truth. It can change its form during a lifetime of one generation and imitate something «new, correct and progressive» each time…

So what is diametrically opposite and incompatible with this environment? The only answer is ISLAM. The last stage of the WAR started 14 centuries ago, and the war has not stopped since the first days of the mankind. The war between MONOTHEISM and mendacious WORLD OF UNBELIEF.Saad Minkailov, political analyst, Jokhar, CRI.

For Kavkaz-Center